MOSES AND THE PHARAOH’S DAUGHTER
Courtesy of: BIWF [NZ] Auckland
Formerly the Adverse Critics could not be answered when they asked for the authenticity of the story of Moses as set forth in the Old Testament. Those who believed in the Bible could merely state that it was in the Bible, and therefore must be true. But how different it is today. I lived in the time when the critics could not be answered, and I have lived to see the day when they can be entirely backed off the stage, and they do not dare to ask their questions. Let us see what archaeology has to say regarding the life story of Moses.
The Hyksos, or Shepherd Kings of Egypt, were not Egyptians, but Asiatics ethnically related to the Semites. They invaded the Nile Valley about the beginning of the Eighteenth century B.C. They came by the way of Palestine, and left their marks upon th a t country. The y overthrew the Egyptian government, ascended the throne, and ruled until the middle of the Fifteenth century B.C. The first king of the Eighteenth Dynasty was the one who led the revolution which overthrew the Hyksos Dynasties, and drove them completely from the country of Egypt. This king was Amosis, or Ahmes, or Ahmose I. The three different spellings refer to the same man. In about 1580 B.C. this king defeated the Hyksos. but lost his life in battle. Today we may see his mummy with the wound that caused his death. He fell upon the battlefield, but his body carefully cared for by his people. The Hyksos were driven from Egypt over the same route by which they entered the country 300 years before. They made stand in Palestine, then disappeared from history.
In 1560 B.C. Amenhotep I succeeded to the throne, and carried out the policies of predecessor. He was a very religious man and built some additions to the temples Karnak and Luxor. In 1540 B.C. he succeeded on the throne by his son Thotmes I. The following year something happened in the family that was and still is a disgrace in an Oriental family- the first born child was a girl. This young lady was named by her father Maatatkara. In spite of her handicap, she was to be one of the great historical characters of all time. She born in the palace at Memphis (Noph) amidst all the splendours of the time. Regardless of the fact that she was a disappointment to her family, nevertheless she was her father’s favourite; she had all his characteristics, his determination, and his energy. If the reader has the notion that she was a pampered, petted young lady, he is all wrong. I am inclined to think that her father, Thotmes I was the general ancestors of all Scotsmen. But in spite of the fact, the Pharaoh’s Daughter enjoyed the good and fine things of this life.
Again, if you think of Egypt of that day in the light of Egypt of today, you are all wrong. It was a beautiful land, almost a fairy land, a dream land in its beauty, and that was especially true in the vicinity of Memphis, the oldest capital of Egypt. Its palaces and temples were of grandeur almost beyond imagination; its gardens (we would call them parks in this country) were far beyond anything that we have today. Within the palace grounds the banks of the Nile were paved with marble in the shape of walks, and steps of the same material led down to and into the gentle waves. Water plants of all kinds nodded their heads in the rippling waves, and the stately papyrus plant stood rigid guard over all. The palace area was carefully walled in, including portions of the river, in order to exclude any stray crocodile that might be looking for a tasty dinner. In your imagination paint as beautiful a picture as you can, then this imagined picture will fall short, far short of reality.
The Pharaoh’s daughter was not a clinging vine. She was the first “athletic” girl of record. She believed in and practised the athletic sports of her day. She was any man’s equal, and she did not hesitate to say so later in her life.
You fathers and mothers who now have grandchildren, do you remember the “Gay 90’s?” Do you remember the hobble-skirt, the camel-walk, then the athletic girl? Neither the styles nor the “fads” of the day were new. In those days the young ladies had what they called “slumber parties” at which very little slumber took place. It was a matter of pillow fights and so on rather than slumber. Even that was not new. Solomon was correct when he said that there is nothing new under the sun.
When the Hyksos were driven from Egypt, the descendants of Jacob remained in the land. They were distant kin to the despised Hyksos, and Amosis I was the first king “who did not know Joseph.” Then the oppression of the Hebrews began in Egypt, i.e. they became the second group in history who did the public building work for the Empire; in other words, the second group of WPA workers, the first being those who built the Great Pyramid at Gizeh under King Khufu. The Semites were put upon public works for two reasons: (a) they seemed to be especially adapted to that sort of work; (b) in that way the increase of population could, according to the theory of the times, be kept within control. At this time the government of Egypt had a population question which was pressing for solution. The birth rate among the Semitic peoples was very high, while it was very low among the Egyptians. It meant that within a very short time the Semites in the land would outnumber the natives, and then all the sacrifices made in order to drive out the Hyksos would be vain. It would be a case of merely changing masters, a very serious question to the Egyptian people. This increase was so rapid that it became necessary for the government to take drastic action to stop it. This action was inaugurated by Thotrnes I. You know the story as related in the First Chapter of Exodus. To carry out this policy, secret police were everywhere to enforce the law, or at least to report any transgression. No one would know who was a member of this dreaded police. But there is always someone who will take the chance of transgressing any law, provided that law interferes with his personal desires.
Thus it was with the mother of Moses. They lived in Memphis and, apparently, quite close to the palace grounds. The young mother was able to hide the infant from the police for about three months, then his lungs became so lusty that he was liable to betray the hiding place at any moment. Something had to be done. What? Then some one in the family had a bright idea. They watched the daily movements of the Pharaoh’s Daughter, the Princess. This was a bold plan indeed.
The Pharaoh’s Daughter held a slumber party one night for her girl friends. Of course, there was very little slumber. Therefore they were up early, as is the custom in the Orient. These young ladies, all “athletic” in their fad , did not rush for the bath tub, nor the shower. They were up to date, and wanted a “plunge” from the old spring-board. As a result of their training, they wended their way down to the Nile to take this plunge. They were walking along on the marble walks ver y close to the edge of the water, when suddenly the Pharaoh’s Daughter stopped, listening. She asked her companions if they had heard what she had – the cry of an infant! Evidently they had. The Princess requested one of the girls to go and see from whence the cry came. In my imagination I can see this young lady go down the steps, put an exploratory toe into the water, then step in, part the papyrus and look down upon the ark (bassinet) filled with a wriggling, kicking something which was all wrapped up in a beautiful little blanket. She stooped down, worked the blanket loose, and saw the awry, wet features of a boy baby. She looked at him a moment, then tickling him in his little”tummy”,!’ she said , “Boo!” The little chap smiled, and stretched out his little arms to her. What woman could resist that motion? She took him up, and carried him to the Princess. The Pharaoh’s Daughter looked at him , and asked: “Is he not a Hebrew child?” But she took him in her arms and petted him.
At this point the third scene of the act takes place. Miriam, the oldest sister of the child, had been standing behind a palm tree all the time to see what would happen. She had carefully timed the movements of the Princess; but there might be a change in her schedule, in that case the sister would be there to take little brother back home. But things worked out fine. The Princess had found him. Miriam then came from behind the tree, approached the Princess, and asked her if she should bring a Nurse. Receiving the affirmative answer, the mother of the child was brought, according to plan, and introduced as the would-be Nurse. The Princess told her to bring the child back to her at a stated time. I am inclined to believe that the plunge was not taken that morning.
News passes rapidly in a palace by means of underground telegraph, and always reaches the wrong ears, or, those for whom the news or gossip is not intended. Soon the Princess was summoned to the presence of her father, the Pharaoh. I suspect that she knew she was in for a bad half-hour; but what girl is afraid of her father? Can you see the King look sternly at his daughter, not saying anything for several minutes? In my imagination I can see him as his daughter stands demurely before him. I can hear him say: “Daughter, did you find an Hebrew child within the Palace grounds this morning, a boy-child?” Then the argument began. I can hear the Pharaoh scold his daughter for breaking one of the proclamations of the government. I think, after a long argument, the Princess said: “Oh, Father, he was such a sweet, smiling, cuddling little chap. I want him as my own.” Then I can hear the king say in an assumed severity and gruffness: “Well, have it your way, then.” The Princess won, as is usual in the case of daughter and father.
Now as we said above, the Princess was born about 1539 B.C. and this little boy came into this world about 1525 B.C. Thus the Princess was fourteen or fifteen years old when she took the “cuddly little fellow” from the Nile. This does not mean that she was a child herself, for Oriental girls are women at twelve years of age, and fully competent to guide their own affairs. The Oriental woman of antiquity was not the mollycoddle that she became after Mohammedanism got control of her earth destiny.
When the Hebrew child was able to eat solid food, he was taken to the Princess at the palace. The mother kissed him good-bye, and thanked Jahweh that his life had been spared.
With that kiss all his Hebrew communications were cut. The Princess adopted him as her son, and he began his career as the Heir-Apparent to the throne of the New Egyptian Empire.
Within two years, the Princess was called to the throne to be co-regent with her father. This was the policy of the Egyptian government- to train the heir, apparent by actual participation in the administration of affairs. This was a very practical way in which to impose such training.
When the Princess actually adopted the child, she named him Thotmes-Meshu. The last part of the Egyptian name has a double meaning: (a) “the son of”; (b) “drawn or rescued from the water.” Thus we have two meanings of the word, first- “the son of Thotmes”; second, “the one who was rescued from the water.”
The child was put into school when he reached the proper age, in addition to having a private Tutor at all times. He attended the great Universities of the land. He studied everything that the curricula had to offer- Art, Science, Literature, Theology, Law, Music, Military Art and Science, Naval Instruction, Mineralogy and many other things. Some day he, in turn, would be the Heir to the throne of the Empire, and he must be prepared to assume the greatest responsibility in the world at that time.
Moses spent the first forty years of his life in school preparing for the task which was ultimately to fall upon his shoulders.
hen Moses was five or six years of age the Princess, the Pharaoh’s Daughter, ascended the throne and became the first great woman in the history of the world – as we have it written today. She assumed the crown under the name of Queen Hatshepsut She married her half-brother, who later became Thotmes 111, and had one child, a daughter, a very beautiful girl, as she is depicted upon the monuments, and described by the Scribes. I have often wondered just what plans the Queen had for this beautiful young girl. Moses was the Heir Apparent to the throne, but he was not of royal descent even if he were the adopted son of the reigning monarch. There would be one way to strengthen his claim upon the throne. The young Princess was of royal blood from each side of lineage, and there could be no question as to her right to the throne except the fact that she was a woman. Her mother, in order to satisfy the principles laid down by the priesthood, was forced to give herself a straight and uninterrupted lineage from the chief god of the pantheon. Besides this, she often appeared in public in male attire, and wearing a false beard. She was a Thotmes, and could hold, her own against the influences that ever attempted to undermine the throne; but could Moses do so, if and when he should ascend the throne? There was one way to stabilize the whole situation – unite the two claimants to the sovereignty by marriage. If such plans were ever in the mind of the Queen, God took a hand and eliminated such possibility by removing the young Princess from the earthly stage of action – she died long before her mother did.
The reign of Queen Hatshepsut was a prosperous one beyond anything that had preceded her in the history of the world. The government had no wars, except one little expedition in Nubia led by Moses himself as the Commander-in-Chief of the Armies of Egypt. The policy was that of expansion, not of territory, but of commerce, and good will among neighbouring nations and peoples. The Queen was to, or rather did, lay up the resources that were to make possible the Imperial Expansion of her actual successor, Thotmes 111.
Evidently the Queen made Moses the Superintendent of Public Works, for he went upon a tour of inspection of the public works of the empire, and it was on this tour that Moses saw the Foreman of the then WPA abuse a Hebrew. You know what happened. Moses lost his temper, and killed the offender. Moses was forty years old, and just at this time the Queen died.
Thotmes 111, a legitimate claimant to the throne, was in the capital city. He seized the throne, proclaimed Moses an outlaw, and proceeded against him with the secret police.
Moses was in the northern part of Egypt, in the vicinity of the Wady Tumilat, when the news reached him of the death of the Queen, and his own status as an outlaw, and the accession ofThotmes III. The Heir and Claimant to the throne of the greatest Empire on earth became a fugitive before the law. He fled to the peninsula of Sinai, to kindred clans and tribes, where he spent the next forty years of his life.
The Queen had carved herself a tomb in the Valley of the Tomb of the Kings opposite the temples of Luxor and Karnak. This tomb is carved, like King “Tut’s,” from the mountain. The sepulchral chamber is about ninety-eight feet below the level of the mountain’s base. Here the sarcophagus with its inscriptions was found, and may be seen in the Egyptian Museum at Cairo; but the mummy of the Queen has never been found to date.
At Dier el Bahari, the Queen built a great temple for herself. It is even today a very beautiful structure, and remarkably preserved even for Egyptian monuments. Here she tells the main facts of her reign, in spite of the fact that Thotmes 111 attempted to destroy every vestige of the Queen’s rule He even built a wall around the obelisks a Karnak so that the people might not be able to read the inscriptions on them. Two of these obelisks are still standing where she placed them; the other has fallen to the ground; the apices of both were plated with gold. Around the temple of Dier el Bahar have been found the broken pieces of the statues of the Queen; but some escape destruction, and we have them today. Some are life-sized, and we now know that the Queen was a very beautiful woman and that she belonged to the white race.
The Author wishes he had time and space to record what archaeology has found in the peninsula of Sinai that bears directly upor the life of Moses when he was there a Governor of the country, the Superintendent of Mines, and in other capacities; but both space and time forbid the attempt. We hope to live long enough to write a whole book on the archaeological discoveries that relate to Moses alone.
Moses spent forty years getting what we call an “education” in the schools of the Empire but he was exactly like the modern student he absorbed information, but he probably did not digest that which he absorbed. He had his head stuffed with facts and theories, but he had no wisdom, or the ability to apply that which he had acquired. That is the trouble with the educational systems of today. If were to offer a word of criticism, God put Moses through another forty years of education, but the process was different – he spent forty years digesting that which had cost him forty years in absorbing, i.e. he spent the second forty years of his life arranging, classifying, surveying the information he had obtained in the college and made it a part of himself- that which he had absorbed, through this process became knowledge.
During this second forty years Moses was not idle, nor was he just sitting around the popularly conceived “wilderness” contemplating. He was active all the time. He made a survey of the peninsula. How do we know?
We know because we have today the map that Moses made. It is even now the best map of the country in existence. On it is found every road, route, and trail. It was drawn on papyrus, and is in almost per condition at the present day. (Bear this fact mind while reading the following chapter).
We shall consider only one incident in the life of the great Lawgiver while he lived in peninsula. You will recall that one day while he was in what is usually called wilderness, he noticed a bush burning. That fact was nothing new; but there was something strange about this particular bush. Moses looked at it closely. His observation had been that wood on fire was always consumed; but this bush was not being consumed according to the laws of chemistry that Moses knew. He approached the phenomenon to attempt to solve this unusual sight. When he approached quite close to the place of the bush, a voice came out of the flame, and commanded him to remove his sandals for he was standing on holy ground. Then that strange conversation took place. Moses inquired who was talking to him. Then the answer came in Egyptian, for Moses was an Egyptian in every way except by birth, PUK-NU-PUK. This is usually translated into the English tongue by the words, I AM.
Now let us come down in time almost fifteen hundred years. The scene is just after Jesus and the Disciples, had left Gethsemane. The Temple Guards (not the Roman soldiers) are seeking the man from Nazareth for the purpose of arresting him. He stands in their midst, and asks whom they seek. They tell him. Now the usual translation of His reply reads: “I am he.” If you will look at the text in the English Bible you will find that the word “he” is printed in italics. This mean that the personal pronoun does not appear in the Greek, the tongue used by Jesus when speaking to the officer of the-guard. Jesus used the Greek verb eimi. The effect of that word was marvellous. Did you ever wonder why the members of the guard were knocked flat , literally, not figuratively, by the reply of Jesus? This is the solution: When Jesus used the Greek word “eimi,” he used identically the same word, in its force, as had been spoken to Moses at the burning bush. The Levites, who constituted the Temple Guard, knew instantly upon the utterance of the word that they stood in the presence of Divinity just as Moses had stood, and it knocked them down physically.
Forty years had passed since the death of Queen Hatshepsut – the government was very much absorbed by its Imperialistic policies, and had no time to give attention to any “minority” which might be within its boundaries. Then on the other hand, the chief minority took advantage of the opportunity to carry its policies into execution. The empire was in a distracted condition externally, i.e. the external affairs absorbed its major attention.
It was at this point that God commanded Moses to take the Children of Israel out of Egypt. At first, Moses demurred. The prevalent view for the reason for this almost refusal is the notion that Moses had some stoppage in his speech, or stuttered, or had some other defect.
Such was not the case. First, the older Moses got, the more he realized his shortcomings; that is always the case with the accumulation of wisdom; second, he probably could not speak fluently the Hebrew which was current. Remember that he was trained exclusively in Egypt. It may be possible, and is even more than probable that he had training in the colleges in Hebrew – something like the modern student receives in Modern Languages-in our current institutions, and any experienced person knows how adept the average student becomes in any tongue so studied. But this difficulty was overcome by the presence of Aaron who was a thorough Hebrew scholar.
So at length the brothers stood before the Pharaoh then upon the throne. This Pharaoh, Merneptah, knew that the man was standing before him who should be sitting upon the throne. Can we guess at the personal interest this monarch had in Moses as he sat with him in conference! What thoughts must have passed through the Egyptian’s mind as he looked upon the man who was the most highly educated man of all antiquity!
Their first interview must have taken place at Memphis (Noph), the oldest capital of the land. This city is twelve miles south of the present city of Cairo and lies, on the average, forty feet beneath the present level of the land. It even lies below the bottom of the Nile. The city of this Pharaoh, Merneptah, lies about eighteen feet beneath the present surface, and is buried beneath five distinctive cities. The palace fell into ruins soon after the death of Memeptah, and remained undisturbed until the university Museum of Pennsylvania uncovered it in 1915. The palace was entirely uncovered, the walls of which still stand many feet high. The throne room was cleared and the platform, upon which the actual throne stood, is still there with all its inscriptions and carvings setting forth the events of his reign and praising the greatness of the king. The columns are still there, covered with hieroglyphics cut in the stone and painted in blue and gold, detailing the exploits of Merneptah. When one walks upon that floor, he is walking upon the same floor that the feet of Moses pressed. Back of the throne room is the royal bath and couch where the monarch might take a nap when he felt so inclined. We can see his mummy now in the Egyptian Museum at Cairo.
The Pharaoh was inclined not to allow the Hebrews to do that which Moses, in the name of Jehovah, demanded. In order to convince the monarch that Jehovah was really God Almighty, he set loose the Ten Plagues. It took ten months to execute these plagues, each a little more severe than its predecessor. In the process and progress of the contest between Pharaoh and Moses, the Pharaoh’s heart was “hardened,” sometimes by God, and sometimes by the stubbornness of the man himself. Nineteen times God is declared to have “hardened the heart” of the Pharaoh, but eleven of these God did, three times Pharaoh did it himself. In five cases it is only announced as being done. The Pharaoh began it, God finished it. The word used for hardening” in the text has three different meanings: (1) “To bind, or make compact”- thus harden; (2) “To make heavy,” i.e. stupidly obstinate and sullen; (3) “To grow hard,” i.e a stubborn and uncontrollable
The question has often been raised: Did Merneptah actually have hardening of the heart, or was that just a figure of speech? The fact is that the heart of the monarch was sent to the Royal College of Surgeons. The heart was studied, and Dr. Shafiock announced that it was actually hardened from a disease known as Atheroma.*
AGAIN GOD’S WORD STANDS VINDICATED!
Moses went to call upon his cousin-in-law, the Pharaoh, Merneptah (Queen Hatshepsut was the monarch’s own blood aunt), and found him at the city of Zoan. Now the location of this city was unknown until Sir Flinders Petrie discovered it in 1884. This city stood in the Field of Zoan, translated by LXX as the Field of Tanis. It is midway between the easternmost branch of the Nile and the Suez Canal, reaching to the shores of Lake Menzaleh. It is the most desolate region in all the land of Egypt. Zoan was a city in the time of the Fourth Dynasty; stood in its beauty in the time of Abraham in the Twelfth Dynasty, and it was here that the Hyksos made their last stand within the borders of Egypt. The inscriptions of Merneptah here at Zoan show conclusively that he succeeded Rameses II. Here in this court Moses and Aaron met the scientists of the court, Jannes and Jambres (see II Timothy 3:8), and defeated them in all their attempts to match the men of Jehovah in, that which they could do. The two court officials did very well for a time, but there finally came a test which they could not duplicate. Jannes and Jambres acknowledged defeat.
The climax of the whole situation was the death of the first-born of man and beast. At this point, the adverse critics for a long time thought that they had discredited the Biblical archaeologist; but God still works in wondrous ways to vindicate His Word. From archaeological evidence (inscriptions) we know that Merneptah was not succeeded on the throne by his oldest son. We are told that this boy died suddenly and unexpectedly, while still very young. This death occurred about the time recorded in the Bible as the time of the death of the first born. This event took place according to the best chronology April 6-7 (midnight) 1486. There are those who set it as 1479. _ The fact of the matter is that according to the estimates of scholars the date of the Exodus varies from 1648-1230 B.C. Hales puts it as 1648; Ussher as 1491; Brestead as 1230 (“if it ever occurred at all,” says the last named). Personally, I favour 1486, or 1479. It seems to me that the weight of archaeological evidence is on the side of the last two named dates.
From the book “Diggers For Facts” by J.O.Kinnaman 1940.
*This hardening is recorded or mentioned nineteen times in Exodus: Once in Chapter IV; four times in Chapter VII; three times in Chapter VIII; three times in Chapter IX; three times in Chapter X; once in Chapter XI; twice in Chapter XIV.

